Biomechanical Characterization of a New Locking Loop Stitch for Graft Fixation versus Krackow Stitch

Background@#The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the biomechanical characteristics of a new locking loop stitch (LLS), developed utilizing the concepts of both running locking stitch and needleless stitch, to the traditional Krackow stitch. @*Methods@#The Krackow stitch with No.2 braided suture and the LLS with 1.3-mm augmented polyblend suture tape were compared biomechanically. The LLS was performed with single strand locking loops and wrapping suture around the tendon, resulting in half the needle penetrations through the graft compared to the Krackow stitch. Twenty bovine extensor tendons were divided randomly into two groups. The tendons were prepared to match equal thickness and cross-sectional area. Each suture-tendon was stitched and preloaded to 5 N for 60 seconds, cyclically loaded to 20 N, 40 N, and 60 N for 10 cycles each, and then loaded to failure. The deformation of the suture-tendon construct, stiffness, yield load, and ultimate load were measured. @*Results@#The LLS had significantly less deformation of the suture-tendon construct at 100 N, 200 N, 300 N, and at ultimate load compared to the Krackow stitch (Krackow stitch and LLS at 100 N: 1.3 ± 0.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.2 mm, p < 0.001; 200 N: 3.0 ± 0.3 mm and 1.9 ± 0.2 mm, p < 0.001; 300 N: 5.1 ± 0.6 mm and 2.9 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.001; ultimate load: 12.8 ± 2.8 mm and 5.0 ± 1.2 mm, p < 0.001).The LLS had significantly greater stiffness (Krackow stitch and LLS: 97.5 ± 6.9 N/mm and 117.2 ± 13.9 N/mm, p < 0.001) and yield load (Krackow stitch and LLS: 66.2 ± 15.9 N and 237.9 ± 93.6 N, p < 0.001) compared to the Krackow stitch. There was no significant difference in ultimate load (Krackow stitch: 450.2 ± 49.4 N; LLS: 472.6 ± 59.8 N; p = 0.290). @*Conclusions@#The LLS had significantly smaller deformation of the suture-tendon construct compared to the Krackow stitch. The LLS may be a viable surgical alternative to the Krackow stitch for graft fixation when secure fixation is necessary.

Does Knee Arthroscopy for Treatment of Meniscal Damage with Osteoarthritis Delay Knee Replacement Compared to Physical Therapy Alone?

Background@#To determine patient factors that lead to treatment of meniscal tears with osteoarthritis (OA) with knee arthroscopy (KA) or physical therapy only (PT-only); and to assess differences in clinical outcomes including the time to knee arthroplasty. @*Methods@#Patients aged ≥ 45 years with OA at meniscal tear diagnosis were followed up from the date of surgery (KA) or first PT visit (PT-only) until partial/total knee replacement surgery, death, disenrollment, or end of study. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared and used to derive propensity scores. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the risk of knee replacement surgery and greater healthcare utilization associated with KA vs. PT-only. @*Results@#Among 7,026 patients (KA, 69%; PT-only, 31%), 27% had partial or total knee replacement surgery during follow-up.PT-only patients were older and more likely to be women and had more comorbidities. After accounting for differences between groups, the cumulative incidence of knee replacement was modestly but significantly higher for those who received KA than those who underwent PT-only (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.17–1.44; p < 0.001), although there was no significant difference in health service utilization, narcotic medication dispenses, or knee injections after initiating treatment. @*Conclusions@#For patients with meniscal damage complicated by OA, those who underwent KA were 30% more likely to have partial or total knee replacement surgery at any given time than those who had PT alone.

The anterolateral ligament of the knee joint: a review of the anatomy, biomechanics, and anterolateral ligament surgery

Residual knee instability and low rates of return to previous sport are major concerns after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To improve outcomes, surgical methods, such as the anatomical single-bundle technique or the double-bundle technique, were developed. However, these reconstruction techniques failed to adequately overcome these problems, and, therefore, new potential answers continue to be of great interest. Based on recent anatomical and biomechanical studies emphasizing the role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in rotational stability, novel surgical methods including ALL reconstruction and anterolateral tenodesis have been introduced with the possibility of resolving residual instability after ACL reconstruction. However, there is still little consensus on many aspects of the ALL, including: several anatomical issues, appropriate indications for ALL surgery, and the optimal surgical method and graft choice for reconstruction surgery. Therefore, further studies are necessary to advance our knowledge of the ALL and its contribution to knee stability.